SPANISH COUNTRY, Yoani SÁNCHEZ AND STONE IN THE SHOE JUSTICE
Ernesto Perez Castillo
The only animal that trips two and three and four times with the same stone is the English newspaper El Pais. Sure facing because he has no other, because the stone can not be removed from the shoe, for the stone in this case is Yoani Sánchez, and it is they who were planted there.
appears that looks like someone in the beyond-the paradise that is ninety miles away and just north of Havana's waterfront, has given the green light to blodeguera to mention, obliquely, the presence of the illegal naval base Guantanamo Bay on Cuban territory. This will give some credibility, it is assumed, but it never should not cross the line to point to mention the torture that are the daily bread of the detainees.
This is very special in its view, the field of detention and torture that the U.S. government pays in Cuba, this is not the problem for Yoani. That is ... she says the real problem is the minefield to which Cuba defends its border, the departure point many provocations that have killed more than a Cuban.
But that's all water under the bridge, and this is not worth the tecleteo. What is new, the unbelievable, unthinkable, to be exact: the unforgivable, is that when Yoani Sanchez refers to people that the CIA has kidnapped throughout the world and, after torturing them for anything, there has been thrown into oblivion in Guantanamo have nothing worse to do with them, the blodeguera says that "wearing uniforms orange, serving long sentences and are frequently alluded to in the foreign media. "
already know that Yoani Sanchez is so ignorant that do not even know he does not know, but that to say that the people held in Guantanamo "serving long sentences" is the height of destitution, if not the bad milk and perversity- because if something have never, ever received the prisoners at Guantanamo is any sentence of any court. Of Indeed, they have not gone to trial. Indeed, until the sun today, and from the first day of their abduction, they have never been formally accused of anything. Above
the blodeguera adventure commenting on them, "had to wait years to clarify its identity and power to go back home" and also: "Maybe some of them could see from his cell the limits of the naval base where was held. "
Note the use of the conjugation of tenses which the philologist star, always abusing and copretérito past, as if in this sunny prisoners were not there. But there are, and that is the hard and dark reality Yoani can not sneak that, even if they dared to poscopretérito the future subjunctive.
is unusual in the same pages that amplified Yoani ramblings, have appeared before WikiLeaks cables on Guantanamo, with the exact figure of how many are still there, to which torture has been submitted and the basis on which charges were arrested, as is the case of Mohamed el Garran, taken to prison after an informer said was part of al-Qaeda cell in London, and no one noticed the detail that Clawson had only eleven years old when he was supposed to prepare grisly attacks and also was never in the UK. That
Yoani say and repeat and fall back with his nonsense, this is a thing of it, but the newspaper El Pais, which is supposed to have editors and proofreaders and confirm every comma before reaching the printed page, "I follow the stream and the post itself that makes it very clear how things are ...
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Eastbourne Woman's Underwear
Ernesto Perez Castillo
Osama bin Laden is dead, so I told the world Barack Obama. Since that was announced by using a formula as misleading, "is dead"-in which even seems that the terrorist was killed by himself, "let see how the Nobel Peace Prize is committed to hit and then wash your hands.
peel and lirondo The truth is that Obama had to say: "I have ordered the killing of Osama bin Laden." But the avalanche of mud that the new Yankee bravado is dragged off and going, since the extrajudicial execution of a number of Al Qaeda returns to lay bare the nakedness of the empire.
worth remembering now that when, in December 1989 the then U.S. president George HW Bush, another Bush-he got between jar and jar to capture General Noriega, head of the War Cabinet of the Republic of Panama, sent to the isthmus to 26 000 soldiers from elite units of the naval commandos, army and the 82 nd Airborne Division, and the invasion ended up costing between 3 000 and 6 000 Panamanian civilians killed in the indiscriminate bombing in the neighborhood Chorrillo, where were the offices of General Noriega.
However, the order was to capture the general, and this was accomplished: Noriega was captured alive, taken to the United States, presented before a court and put behind bars. And Noriega had an army to defend themselves.
What explains then that Osama bin Laden was killed, if he was not in a cave or a bunker, but in an apartment complex with his family, with just two bodyguards? Best
been dropped late Jay Carney, White House spokesman: bin Laden "was not armed." Of course Carney or too cynical or too stupid, because after that release added that though he had no weapons with them "is not necessary to be armed to resist." Certainly the terrorist was about to scratch and bite their captors.
The fact is that Osama bin Laden received at least one shot in the head and chest, and there is no clear evidence that they wanted him quite dead, as to neutralize, and capture him alive, if it wanted was not necessary to tear the head or destroy the heart.
about it, Barack Obama has said "justice has been done." That justice can not be other than that of the barbaric Talion Law requiring life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, blow for blow.
"And that" justice "is the man of" change "offers the world? Yes, and as for you. There is no human explanation to justify that while in the war on terrorism sparked by the second Bush have kidnapped hundreds of people in half the world and have been tortured and confined for years in Guantanamo Bay illegal to extract information, leading to even some to suicide, "now, when suddenly hold in their hands to Al Qaeda leader, simply pull the trigger, and dispose of his body under water.
And on the way to his death, again, the United States government has missed all international standards by sending an armed group to violate the borders of a foreign country, and there illegally entering someone to kill him pointed out the emperor's thumbs down.
Why the U.S. president ordered the death of Osama bin Laden? Why chose a career dead before trial? Why no attempt was an interrogation, when she was a very valuable source of information? Obviously because of this: because it querían muted, y una muerte y right quick it was the only way to make sure of getting bin Laden mantuviera bien su mouth shut.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Gallbladder Polops While Pregnant
The John Paul II and anger
is normal that John Paul II has opponents. First, because Jesus Christ avirtió that ay! if everyone speaks well of us. 'Happily, when you insult and slander you because of me. " Moreover, John Paul II himself said in one of his visits to Spain in response to the cries 'John Paul II, the whole world loves you', 'Then he said, the English did not have many options', which speaks volumes about the sensitivity of those who so loved the human freedom as the sacred place of encounter with the Transcendent.
is not surprising, since the claim of John Paul II of human freedom and human rights, based on the sacredness of the person as its source, crashed and frontal crashes and absolutely against the walls built by ideology totalitarian, which date to the person on the basis of ideology. Not surprisingly, therefore, attempts some press that serves primarily to political ideology and has tried every means overshadow the profile of the new blessed, even through the most clumsy manipulation. For example, it is already ridiculous and old to brand the use of ultra-conservative John Paul II and uncompromising with doctrinal dissent. This stereotype, those who know the work and actions of John Paul II first hand, know the reality so far has been built and nurtured for over 30 years by a series of dissident theologians, commentators and journalists, not bore the influence of the Pope (or support after his death), mainly for ideological reasons. The Pope's speeches and writings and their own personal contact with the dissidents, denied the allegations. There have even been
media and commentators who, terrified by the ghost of the dead Pope, have not stopped trying to overshadow her figure, with real stupid, like publishing something so surreal and fake as it protected the alleged pederast Marcial Maciel (pathological liar who came to fool even some of his closest aides with his double life, until he was discovered by the Vatican and suspended from duty) ... Such a statement would be similar to accuse a judge to protect a criminal for not directly condemn without investigation or trial. Finally, as absurd as the attempt by New York Times muddy of Benedict XVI to cases of pedophilia, which ended up undermining the prestige of the newspaper. For this to take anything, even if caught by the hair, which would encourage critical, to have looked very closely at the guest list for the Holy See ... "The Vatican has invited Mugabe!" They say on the news of Four belonging to the Italian far right (Tele 5). "Funny they do not criticize the presence of Berlusconi, the parties 'bunga-bunga', another example of great democrat and good government. The same post the serious once E l ° Country be radicalized to withstand the pull of Public target audience , and the public itself ... as if it were a substantive data. I do not know how to interpret the words of Christ ... 'does not need a doctor's healthy, but the sick. " Hopefully Pius XII could have gone to meet with Hitler!
Furthermore, and speaking as the landscape within the church itself, I can not help smiling sardonically when one of the 'theologians superstars', "of those to whom much like to see your signature on The Country or exit Digital Religion and pontificate like both saying that the Catholic Church has to be democratized (as if this were a political party or organization) - furiously criticized the beatification of John Paul II. According to them, beatification is an imposition of a hierarchy that has kidnapped ultraconservative doctrinally to the Church, and a Pope-I read yesterday, "that has acted badly, skipping the canonical norms unilaterally to accelerate the process of beatification. Curious arguments: first, calling for democracy, but on the other they refuse to accept a decision based on the spontaneous demonstration universal and the Christian people who, under the cry of "Santo Subito" not only calls but its mass beatification canonization (nobody is aware that John Paul II canonized already de facto). I do not know whose idea of \u200b\u200bdemocracy will have these men ... will be to many politicians, democracy always, except when I do not like. God grant that the Church will never be diminished to that. Curious
also critical of the (alleged) acceleration of a process that they themselves branded as anachronistic. Anyway, it is clear that is not broken any canon law (which, moreover, the Pope can repeal and alter, for the simple reason that he has authority and legitimacy to do so), but simply reduced the reasonable time which is often the Church before any such process, during which they collected the miracles, etc..
In a mass media do not want to understand anything outside of the comfortable and profitable bipolar ideological and political game, it is normal that incomprehensible figure like John Paul II, something like a degree sextro equation with integral random functions square roots. But it is also for people that are supposed to seek God's will and have even made a radical existential choice simply cries out to heaven. Perhaps it is that too long ago some are seeking more for themselves than God. Let me give you some advice, and sorry for the audacity, to give them, so smart, advice, I hope they do not bother just to vds. a simple layman have this audacity, "to pray. That cures everything.
is normal that John Paul II has opponents. First, because Jesus Christ avirtió that ay! if everyone speaks well of us. 'Happily, when you insult and slander you because of me. " Moreover, John Paul II himself said in one of his visits to Spain in response to the cries 'John Paul II, the whole world loves you', 'Then he said, the English did not have many options', which speaks volumes about the sensitivity of those who so loved the human freedom as the sacred place of encounter with the Transcendent.
is not surprising, since the claim of John Paul II of human freedom and human rights, based on the sacredness of the person as its source, crashed and frontal crashes and absolutely against the walls built by ideology totalitarian, which date to the person on the basis of ideology. Not surprisingly, therefore, attempts some press that serves primarily to political ideology and has tried every means overshadow the profile of the new blessed, even through the most clumsy manipulation. For example, it is already ridiculous and old to brand the use of ultra-conservative John Paul II and uncompromising with doctrinal dissent. This stereotype, those who know the work and actions of John Paul II first hand, know the reality so far has been built and nurtured for over 30 years by a series of dissident theologians, commentators and journalists, not bore the influence of the Pope (or support after his death), mainly for ideological reasons. The Pope's speeches and writings and their own personal contact with the dissidents, denied the allegations. There have even been
media and commentators who, terrified by the ghost of the dead Pope, have not stopped trying to overshadow her figure, with real stupid, like publishing something so surreal and fake as it protected the alleged pederast Marcial Maciel (pathological liar who came to fool even some of his closest aides with his double life, until he was discovered by the Vatican and suspended from duty) ... Such a statement would be similar to accuse a judge to protect a criminal for not directly condemn without investigation or trial. Finally, as absurd as the attempt by New York Times muddy of Benedict XVI to cases of pedophilia, which ended up undermining the prestige of the newspaper. For this to take anything, even if caught by the hair, which would encourage critical, to have looked very closely at the guest list for the Holy See ... "The Vatican has invited Mugabe!" They say on the news of Four belonging to the Italian far right (Tele 5). "Funny they do not criticize the presence of Berlusconi, the parties 'bunga-bunga', another example of great democrat and good government. The same post the serious once E l ° Country be radicalized to withstand the pull of Public target audience , and the public itself ... as if it were a substantive data. I do not know how to interpret the words of Christ ... 'does not need a doctor's healthy, but the sick. " Hopefully Pius XII could have gone to meet with Hitler!
Furthermore, and speaking as the landscape within the church itself, I can not help smiling sardonically when one of the 'theologians superstars', "of those to whom much like to see your signature on The Country or exit Digital Religion and pontificate like both saying that the Catholic Church has to be democratized (as if this were a political party or organization) - furiously criticized the beatification of John Paul II. According to them, beatification is an imposition of a hierarchy that has kidnapped ultraconservative doctrinally to the Church, and a Pope-I read yesterday, "that has acted badly, skipping the canonical norms unilaterally to accelerate the process of beatification. Curious arguments: first, calling for democracy, but on the other they refuse to accept a decision based on the spontaneous demonstration universal and the Christian people who, under the cry of "Santo Subito" not only calls but its mass beatification canonization (nobody is aware that John Paul II canonized already de facto). I do not know whose idea of \u200b\u200bdemocracy will have these men ... will be to many politicians, democracy always, except when I do not like. God grant that the Church will never be diminished to that. Curious
also critical of the (alleged) acceleration of a process that they themselves branded as anachronistic. Anyway, it is clear that is not broken any canon law (which, moreover, the Pope can repeal and alter, for the simple reason that he has authority and legitimacy to do so), but simply reduced the reasonable time which is often the Church before any such process, during which they collected the miracles, etc..
In a mass media do not want to understand anything outside of the comfortable and profitable bipolar ideological and political game, it is normal that incomprehensible figure like John Paul II, something like a degree sextro equation with integral random functions square roots. But it is also for people that are supposed to seek God's will and have even made a radical existential choice simply cries out to heaven. Perhaps it is that too long ago some are seeking more for themselves than God. Let me give you some advice, and sorry for the audacity, to give them, so smart, advice, I hope they do not bother just to vds. a simple layman have this audacity, "to pray. That cures everything.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)