is normal that John Paul II has opponents. First, because Jesus Christ avirtió that ay! if everyone speaks well of us. 'Happily, when you insult and slander you because of me. " Moreover, John Paul II himself said in one of his visits to Spain in response to the cries 'John Paul II, the whole world loves you', 'Then he said, the English did not have many options', which speaks volumes about the sensitivity of those who so loved the human freedom as the sacred place of encounter with the Transcendent.
is not surprising, since the claim of John Paul II of human freedom and human rights, based on the sacredness of the person as its source, crashed and frontal crashes and absolutely against the walls built by ideology totalitarian, which date to the person on the basis of ideology. Not surprisingly, therefore, attempts some press that serves primarily to political ideology and has tried every means overshadow the profile of the new blessed, even through the most clumsy manipulation. For example, it is already ridiculous and old to brand the use of ultra-conservative John Paul II and uncompromising with doctrinal dissent. This stereotype, those who know the work and actions of John Paul II first hand, know the reality so far has been built and nurtured for over 30 years by a series of dissident theologians, commentators and journalists, not bore the influence of the Pope (or support after his death), mainly for ideological reasons. The Pope's speeches and writings and their own personal contact with the dissidents, denied the allegations. There have even been
media and commentators who, terrified by the ghost of the dead Pope, have not stopped trying to overshadow her figure, with real stupid, like publishing something so surreal and fake as it protected the alleged pederast Marcial Maciel (pathological liar who came to fool even some of his closest aides with his double life, until he was discovered by the Vatican and suspended from duty) ... Such a statement would be similar to accuse a judge to protect a criminal for not directly condemn without investigation or trial. Finally, as absurd as the attempt by New York Times muddy of Benedict XVI to cases of pedophilia, which ended up undermining the prestige of the newspaper. For this to take anything, even if caught by the hair, which would encourage critical, to have looked very closely at the guest list for the Holy See ... "The Vatican has invited Mugabe!" They say on the news of Four belonging to the Italian far right (Tele 5). "Funny they do not criticize the presence of Berlusconi, the parties 'bunga-bunga', another example of great democrat and good government. The same post the serious once E l ° Country be radicalized to withstand the pull of Public target audience , and the public itself ... as if it were a substantive data. I do not know how to interpret the words of Christ ... 'does not need a doctor's healthy, but the sick. " Hopefully Pius XII could have gone to meet with Hitler!
Furthermore, and speaking as the landscape within the church itself, I can not help smiling sardonically when one of the 'theologians superstars', "of those to whom much like to see your signature on The Country or exit Digital Religion and pontificate like both saying that the Catholic Church has to be democratized (as if this were a political party or organization) - furiously criticized the beatification of John Paul II. According to them, beatification is an imposition of a hierarchy that has kidnapped ultraconservative doctrinally to the Church, and a Pope-I read yesterday, "that has acted badly, skipping the canonical norms unilaterally to accelerate the process of beatification. Curious arguments: first, calling for democracy, but on the other they refuse to accept a decision based on the spontaneous demonstration universal and the Christian people who, under the cry of "Santo Subito" not only calls but its mass beatification canonization (nobody is aware that John Paul II canonized already de facto). I do not know whose idea of \u200b\u200bdemocracy will have these men ... will be to many politicians, democracy always, except when I do not like. God grant that the Church will never be diminished to that. Curious
also critical of the (alleged) acceleration of a process that they themselves branded as anachronistic. Anyway, it is clear that is not broken any canon law (which, moreover, the Pope can repeal and alter, for the simple reason that he has authority and legitimacy to do so), but simply reduced the reasonable time which is often the Church before any such process, during which they collected the miracles, etc..
In a mass media do not want to understand anything outside of the comfortable and profitable bipolar ideological and political game, it is normal that incomprehensible figure like John Paul II, something like a degree sextro equation with integral random functions square roots. But it is also for people that are supposed to seek God's will and have even made a radical existential choice simply cries out to heaven. Perhaps it is that too long ago some are seeking more for themselves than God. Let me give you some advice, and sorry for the audacity, to give them, so smart, advice, I hope they do not bother just to vds. a simple layman have this audacity, "to pray. That cures everything.
0 comments:
Post a Comment