The future scares. The times are dark. Everyone in Spain feel some attachment to democracy, be warned and prepared: the year 1984 is closer . It may seem a bit alarmist this reflection, yes, but I am convinced that is the truth, if not, do not write. After talking with someone well aware of the issue I'm going to play, I have no choice but to, in good conscience, write this post.
Beyond Sinde law and try to create an agency driver media, the real threat to democracy is the draft law on equal treatment integral, which is cooking Ms. Leire Pajin with the aid, just to say, as regards merit-strong ideologues in the shade. The draft is being sold as social progress, as part of a premise acceptable to all: that all are equal in dignity and that, therefore, we must oppose unfair discrimination in all spheres of society. But in fact, conceals an attempt control of dissent, especially media-by the Government.
The draft text, based on the basic idea, acceptable by all, ends up going far beyond the target, and he even made to personal issues such as the "criteria" (Art. 4.1. Par.2.). The areas to which they apply the law are very specific (race, sex, sexual orientation ...) but leave the door open to interpretation: "... or any other condition or personal or social circumstance." (A modeling agency ... will have to hire girls or guys who do not meet the requirements of beauty, stature ... to enforce the law? O. .. a Catholic university (or Islamic or Jewish, or atheist activist) who wants to sign a professor of philosophy according to its principles, what will?).
But there are things far more disturbing is that in democracy, the right protects citizens against the power, and can only be punished by law when it has been shown to be guilty. This, "which comes from Rome, is violated the law, which states that ... than the defendant who must prove his innocence! this barbarism just two thousand years of humanitarian law. To make matters worse, the law encourages the accusation, which breaks the trust in human relationships, which will be fundamentally flawed, creating and a system of social control and, ultimately, mental-owelliano.
I think this law is an attempt to control by the State Government, media (the field of law extends to virtually all aspects of public life), and education, since neither means or by private institutions or may not have already concluded an ideology that does not match the officially declared as "politically correct." Consider that not talking about insults, which are punishable by law from ever, but free expression of ideas, opinions ... There will not be able to freely express moral issues, values, sexual ethics, taking sides on controversial public ... because they can be challenged by any that in its name or the name of a group allegedly offended, can take legal action ... considering that the originator of the message who must prove his innocence, accusing and not guilty of that. And all under the threat of gross economic penalties : ie to say what you think, in Spain you can lose the property and ruin your life . All this in a social control system that rewards a government informer and hostile to any form of dissident thought ... A weapon that can be used arbitrarily for power against dissent. This, in plain, called the ruling TERROR. (I dread to think what would happen if a Rubalcaba comes to power with this law.) If anyone thinks I exaggerate, read the law http://www.migualdad.es/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application% 2Fpdf & blobheadername1 = Content-disposition = inline & blobheadervalue1 & blobkey = id & blobtable = MungoBlobs & blobwhere = 1244654879230 & ssbinary = true whose formulation abochornaría even politicians in Eastern Europe of the twentieth century, for his nerve.
The problem is that long ago that a large Most English has stopped worrying about the democratic health of society in which he lives and has only begun to mobilize when it started to fail pocket. Already told the Romans, who knew us well, "Beati Hispani biber quibus est vivere."
0 comments:
Post a Comment