Da worth checking out, once again, how the English and rebels tend to mobilize quickly and strongly when we remove the defects or football, not infinitely more serious issues and necessary. But it is true that perhaps some aspect of the new law of snuff itself is a serious concern, as the essence of democracy may be at stake. I mean the essence of the law (the protection of the health of all and the necessary removal of smoke from public places, we have all earned). Nor am I referring to the practical applications and therefore questionable, the new law.
I refer to an issue seemingly "collateral", in particular the call by the Minister Pajín encouraging the denunciation and the tip. This does seem to me very serious and far exceeds the importance of the debate about the new law of snuff. As we saw with previous laws, social legislation not only aims to improve the lives of citizens through concrete actions on reality legal and existing rules, but has a clearly formed, ie, seeks to educate the public and shape society as an ideological model, the Socialist.
Therefore, it is particularly worrying since the government promotes the assumption of the citizens of a monitoring function that is not theirs. One thing is to ask the cooperation of citizens to secure rights that protect the legislation by citizen complaints against premises where necessary, and quite another to promote and normalize from power a comprehensive vigilance and neurotic. Is it intended to create a constant vigilance over one another as happens in other companies subject to totalitarianism, such as Cuba and Morocco, where there are "reporting" unofficial in every neighborhood and street? Do you want to get used to citizenship for a psychological attitude of collaboration with the power, so when you have to bring into play the most important ideological questions that seek to silence dissent? I truly believe and I hope not, but it should not surprise us such attitudes by a highly ideological socialist government, the "old style", whose party has not yet over provincial ideological radicalism to European social democracy. Not be forgotten that socialism was the ideological framework of all twentieth-century totalitarianism. Orwell knew well. Collaboration
citizen
yes, definitely, especially on more important issues. But vigilantism "social fascist, of course not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment